During the foundations unit we covered three major civilizations, Egypt, Greece and Rome. Throughout the unit we observed  how each of these civilizations rose from the Earth and how their cultures  influenced the creation, rise and fall of each of these societies.
The thing that strikes me most about each of the  places we studied are the parallels in design and architecture that exist  throughout each civilization. All take the same basic principles and apply them to  buildings and other structures that are conducive with their own culture.
There is a paralleling idea of centrality amongst  each of these civilizations. The Egyptians built their pyramids in such a  fashion that the corners of them, if the lines were extended, would reach the four  corners of the Earth. The Greeks believed that they were literally at the center  of the world and the Romans capital and heartbeat, for some time, was the city  of Rome, which existed at the center of the Roman Empire.
In Egypt and Mesopotamia we see the beginnings of  one of the most prominent elements of foundation, the technique of stacking. These  people chose this design technique for reasons suited to their own culture,  just as those who followed would do as well. The Egyptians and Mesopotamians  used stacking in their structures as a way to create layers and the higher  the layers went, the closer to god or the gods one would be. They also used  this stacking technique to show a hierarchy. The Pharaoh, high priest, or  other important figure would exist only in the highest, most central point of a structure while everyone else tiered downward. Another method the  Egyptians used to show hierarchy is the size of the structures themselves. The  Pharaohs used size to show power, which explains the colossal size of Egyptian  structures, like the pyramids.  
In Greece, we see stacking as well but with some  variations to fit the Grecian lifestyle and values. All buildings in Greece return  back to the megaron structure, a simple place of worship with three sides and  columns down the center. The element of stacking in this scenario is more  horizontal than vertical, with the hierarchy moving from the outside of a building  to the center rather than from the ground up as it did in Egypt. The Grecians developed the porch, court, and hearth system of hierarchies to mirror  the stacking hierarchy techniques of Egypt. The most important part of the  building existed in the hearth. This would be a statue of one of the gods or  where an important person resided. The idea of the porch, court, and hearth  exists in one of Greece’s most important sites, the Acropolis. The Parthenon,  which houses Athena, would be considered the hearth of this structure, the  most important place. The court is where you stand and move about the space  after you have entered through the porch of the Propylaea. Greece also draws  lines back to Egypt as they use scale as a sign of importance. The Parthenon  is the most important building at the Acropolis and therefore it is the largest  of all the structures. 
With the rise of the Roman Empire came a rise in  values that did not exist for most of the citizens of Egypt and Greece. Rome thrived  on extravagant pleasure, building large baths for its citizens. It existed  on the idea of “bread and circuses.” Which basically means they showered their citizens with entertainment in hopes they would turn a blind eye to the politics and problems of Rome. The lines of the basic idea of stacking  drawn through Egypt and Greece also extend well into Rome. They however, put  more emphasis on horizontal expression rather than vertical, using the arch  to stack their structures on the Earth’s surface, covering as much area as  possible to claim as Rome’s. It was understood that the larger the scale of the  buildings and the more surface area they covered, the more powerful the Roman  Empire was.
This class continues to open my eyes to the lines  that run into our current society from civilizations past. It is amazing that  even after all of this time and all the technological feats we have overcome that  the spirit of antiquity and their methods still exist in our modern day architecture.
![]()  | 
| The ideas and values of ancient civilizations still exist amongst our modern world. The Louvre in Paris, France. | 

Hailey-
ReplyDelete-I agree with all your statements of different characteristics from each civilization carrying on into others. It's very obvious that the idea of stacking and power were prominent. The Roman empire was one who went with more ideas of luxury and 'delight' and wasn't solely based on function and firmness.
-I like your picture, I used the same one :)
-Word count is 734: over achiever.
Good job!
I agree with your point of view about the difference in architecture and how it changes and adapts through time. I specially love the picture because the Louvre is one of my favorite musiums and a great example of mordern meets old world.
ReplyDeleteGreat Job
Hailey! my group buddy... Just wanted to start out saying you definitely reached 500 words! Trust me, I did the same, once you start going, it's hard to stop. It was great that you separated each civilization clearly, completely easy to understand. The quality of your essay is good, you touched on everything you needed to. The picture use is great, refers you back to ancient Egypt.
ReplyDeleteGreat synthesization on the ideas of centrality in regards to each civilization.
ReplyDeleteInteresting points on horizontal stacking in relation to Grecian order.
Concluding statement and image looks to our time and our expression of ancient fundamentals.
Your essay was detailed and clearly went through what we discussed in this unit. Your picture relates back to the first structures in Egypt to express the foundation of architecture. The word count is above what was needed but you didn't ramble.
ReplyDeleteExcellent and well written. Fabulous image well chosen. The emphasis put on each culture was clearly dramatized and well thought out.
ReplyDeletegood J_O_B.