In these particular two cathedrals, the methodology  was worth contemplating for sheer fear of collapse of the two structures.  Not only did these structures serve the purpose of housing individuals for  worship and other practices, but also they served as symbols of the wealth power of  the church and the place in which the cathedral was erected. If a cathedral  were to collapse, it would not only injure individuals but the image of the  church would also be damaged. The designers of these two buildings chose to  showcase ability in two different manners, at Florence with the dome and Amiens  with the sheer height of the cathedral and intricate flying buttress system. The complications these two spaces overcame in their stages of construction  proved that feats no one thought possible were a reality. The Gothic cathedrals  of this time made large strides in the scale of buildings, producing larger  domes and taller walls than ever before. The structural failures of these  buildings only help us learn what is and is not conducive to the building process  of this genre. We can only study and perfect what lessons have already been  learned in the production of these massive structures.
Amiens Cathedral vs. Cologne Cathedral:
Though there are easily discernable regional  differences between one and two tower structures, these differences do not exist  between the Amiens and Cologne cathedrals despite their locations. These  cathedrals are extremely similar in both floor plan and outward appearance. Both use influences from France with their flying buttress system, allowing these structures to be built taller than ever before. These two cathedrals  exist in regions that are extremely close to one another and many other  similarities that strive towards the symbol of religious power are noticeable. The  question of regional differences gets somewhat blurred between these two  structures upon first glance, but the details are what sets each of these under their  own regional categories. The two-tower entrance only increases the dwarfing  feeling of man in Gods presence. Entry into a single tower makes the person  entering feel more a part of the cathedral, whereas if they are entering between  two massive structures, they understand their place in religious hierarchy. 
Amiens Cathedral vs. Salisbury Cathedral:
These two cathedrals spawned from very different circumstances and it is apparent in their design features. The Salisbury Cathedral, which predates the city, which surrounds it, appears to be a  sanctuary amongst the chaos of the surrounding town. The manicured lawn and  courtyard facility greatly contrast with the close buildings and roadways that  surround Amiens. It is apparent Salisbury had room to grow, not being limited by  urban surroundings. Aside from the sites, the buildings themselves are  apparent in their hindrances (or advantages) of the landscape around them. The  Salisbury cathedral, with room to spread its wings, is a much more horizontally  strong building, built into its landscape while Amiens, a vertically strong  building, was built up, out of its landscape. The solution to the question, how  does a building make room for itself in an urban setting, is apparent in the  Amiens cathedral. Rather than building out, the building must be built up,  consuming as little ground level square footage as possible. The challenges of  building a cathedral sans city would be the fact that one isn’t sure how the future  city will form around the existing structure or if the structures design will  be cohesive in design and cultural influences as the city that springs up  around it. A major opportunity in a building of this type would be the  limitless area in which the building could potentially be constructed, leaving the  limits only with the architects. A challenge of building a major cathedral in an  already populated urban area would be the available space in which to put the cathedral. The cathedral must be able to mold with the city that already surrounds it, destroying as little existing structure as possible. An opportunity however, is that a builder and designer are able to study  the culture and flow of the city around them and mold the cathedral to best  support the area in which it will inhabit, to make it special and a real focal  point for the city in which it is being placed.
A Medieval Home Companion:
 The Medieval time period existed between late Rome  and the Renaissance. This was a time of governmental and social instability,  ridden with war and insecurity. It was not a wealthy time for the average  citizen who lived in constant fear of invasion and starvation. Not only were  governments at war; the church was filled with conflict as well, trying to secure their stronghold in the social and political hierarchy. Because these people  lived in fear, mostly everything they owned was small and mobile, able to be  taken with them at the first sign of any trouble. They had in their homes only the necessities and many times did without those because they simply could  not afford them. These dwellings were small, normally no bigger than a  single room. This was partially due to the concern of warmth in the freezing English countryside. It was simply easier to warm a single room than multiple.  Furnishings and dwellings were made from local, cheap, and easy to obtain materials  such as straw, wood, and mud clay materials.  In this case, this woman is doing the best that she can with what  little is given to her. The singular door pictured to the right of the  illustration is most likely the only entrance into the one room home. The windows,  although they let in cold, are not glassed and are there for light and  ventilation purposes. The carrot on the floor was most likely grown in the family  garden and is one of the few that survived. Later she will most likely prepare  it on the single wood burning stove or merely a fire, where she will serve it  to her family at a single wooden table. Then, as the sun goes down, they will  lie down to sleep on straw mattresses that also exist in the same room.
The Medieval time period existed between late Rome  and the Renaissance. This was a time of governmental and social instability,  ridden with war and insecurity. It was not a wealthy time for the average  citizen who lived in constant fear of invasion and starvation. Not only were  governments at war; the church was filled with conflict as well, trying to secure their stronghold in the social and political hierarchy. Because these people  lived in fear, mostly everything they owned was small and mobile, able to be  taken with them at the first sign of any trouble. They had in their homes only the necessities and many times did without those because they simply could  not afford them. These dwellings were small, normally no bigger than a  single room. This was partially due to the concern of warmth in the freezing English countryside. It was simply easier to warm a single room than multiple.  Furnishings and dwellings were made from local, cheap, and easy to obtain materials  such as straw, wood, and mud clay materials.  In this case, this woman is doing the best that she can with what  little is given to her. The singular door pictured to the right of the  illustration is most likely the only entrance into the one room home. The windows,  although they let in cold, are not glassed and are there for light and  ventilation purposes. The carrot on the floor was most likely grown in the family  garden and is one of the few that survived. Later she will most likely prepare  it on the single wood burning stove or merely a fire, where she will serve it  to her family at a single wooden table. Then, as the sun goes down, they will  lie down to sleep on straw mattresses that also exist in the same room. |  | 
| A typical Medieval dwelling. | 
 

 
[1] watch quality of drawing. nice writing, though. [2] a thorough exploration and good illustrations. citations?
ReplyDelete